My aforementioned MS Paint skills at work anonymyzing mobile phone numbers. |
I saw the above ad in the Courier today, and I couldn't help
but comment on it here.
1AAAAA CARS, ALL CARS
FREE REMOVAL
I don’t get it? I mean I get it, but on second glance, I
don’t get why putting ‘1AAAAA’ was the strategy they chose.
I mean look at what they have elected to use; they clearly
understand the concept of getting in on top based on the alphanumerical
ordering system, hence the multiple A’s and single 1 in front of their ad
proper. But it clearly didn’t work, because they forgot a couple of key points.
First, they forgot that there would be cars legitimately
advertising their year model first (such as the pre-empting Mazda Astina), and which
are thus numerically superior to a single 1. And secondly they forgot that no
matter how many A’s you put after it, it is still going to the back of the line
if anyone uses a single other letter past 1! I mean why include A’s at all, if
you understand that a 1 pre-empts it? Did they think there would be a lot of
1BBBBBBB’s? Or 1AA’s? Yet they never considered a 11AAAA or the logical next
step, 111AAA, then 1111AA, followed by 1111A and then eventually the far
superior 11111?
Or perhaps they did it because they wanted to pack in a bit
more legitimacy. After all people do use numbers to tell actual information
about a car, as mentioned above, so perhaps they felt it would be a bit disingenuous
to put 1111111 first, whereas people are so used to a bunch of A’s before an
advertisement that it is no longer considered dishonest to jam them in front of
your true advertising goal.
But hey, as I have said many times; I am prone to over thinking
things.
I would however think that there would be an interesting
study in here somewhere about the lengths of AAAAAAAA’s that people are willing
to go to in their advertising.
At any rate, that is the end of my little rant on the
subject.
MM
No comments:
Post a Comment